{"id":4202,"date":"2022-01-20T19:54:16","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T18:54:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/?p=4202"},"modified":"2023-11-21T12:36:34","modified_gmt":"2023-11-21T11:36:34","slug":"un-tribunal-de-aviles-concede-a-la-madre-de-una-menor-de-ocho-anos-la-capacidad-decisoria-sobre-su-vacunacion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/un-tribunal-de-aviles-concede-a-la-madre-de-una-menor-de-ocho-anos-la-capacidad-decisoria-sobre-su-vacunacion\/","title":{"rendered":"Un tribunal d&rsquo;Avil\u00e9s accorde \u00e0 la m\u00e8re d&rsquo;un enfant de moins de huit ans le pouvoir de d\u00e9cision concernant sa vaccination."},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t<div data-elementor-type=\"wp-post\" data-elementor-id=\"4202\" class=\"elementor elementor-4202 elementor-137\" data-elementor-settings=\"[]\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-section-wrap\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<section class=\"elementor-section elementor-top-section elementor-element elementor-element-5c7896d3 elementor-section-boxed elementor-section-height-default elementor-section-height-default\" data-id=\"5c7896d3\" data-element_type=\"section\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-container elementor-column-gap-default\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-column elementor-col-100 elementor-top-column elementor-element elementor-element-22f5886b\" data-id=\"22f5886b\" data-element_type=\"column\">\n\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-wrap elementor-element-populated\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-element elementor-element-2c121801 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor\" data-id=\"2c121801\" data-element_type=\"widget\" data-widget_type=\"text-editor.default\">\n\t\t\t\t<div class=\"elementor-widget-container\">\n\t\t\t<style>\/*! elementor - v3.5.5 - 03-02-2022 *\/\n.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-stacked .elementor-drop-cap{background-color:#818a91;color:#fff}.elementor-widget-text-editor.elementor-drop-cap-view-framed .elementor-drop-cap{color:#818a91;border:3px solid;background-color:transparent}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap{margin-top:8px}.elementor-widget-text-editor:not(.elementor-drop-cap-view-default) .elementor-drop-cap-letter{width:1em;height:1em}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap{float:left;text-align:center;line-height:1;font-size:50px}.elementor-widget-text-editor .elementor-drop-cap-letter{display:inline-block}<\/style>\t\t\t\t<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Le tribunal d&rsquo;instruction n\u00b0 7 d&rsquo;Avil\u00e9s a accord\u00e9 \u00e0 la m\u00e8re la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cider de la vaccination d&rsquo;une enfant de 8 ans afin qu&rsquo;elle re\u00e7oive l&rsquo;ensemble des vaccins, conform\u00e9ment aux recommandations des autorit\u00e9s sanitaires.<\/p>\n<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Cette d\u00e9cision du juge repose sur le fait que la m\u00e8re a la garde de l&rsquo;enfant, tandis que le p\u00e8re b\u00e9n\u00e9ficie des week-ends altern\u00e9s et de la moiti\u00e9 de sa p\u00e9riode de vacances.<\/p>\n<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">La m\u00e8re plaidait en faveur de la vaccination de l&rsquo;enfant, tandis que le p\u00e8re pr\u00e9f\u00e9rait ne pas le faire. Tout l&rsquo;entourage de l&rsquo;enfant \u00e9tait vaccin\u00e9, la m\u00e8re \u00e9tant professionnelle de la sant\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">En revanche, le p\u00e8re, apr\u00e8s avoir re\u00e7u la premi\u00e8re dose, a souffert de tachycardie et a refus\u00e9 de suivre le sch\u00e9ma complet.<\/p>\n<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Le juge a donc argument\u00e9 que la vaccination de l&rsquo;enfant ne va pas \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de son int\u00e9r\u00eat, mais qu&rsquo;elle est mise en place pour \u00e9viter le d\u00e9veloppement d&rsquo;une gravit\u00e9 plus importante en cas d&rsquo;infection. Cette vaccination est approuv\u00e9e par les autorit\u00e9s sanitaires et les p\u00e9diatres. Cette mesure vise non seulement \u00e0 obtenir une meilleure r\u00e9ponse immunitaire, en n&rsquo;oubliant pas que les enfants peuvent contracter la COVID-19, mais elle est \u00e9galement une mesure de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 pour autrui, ainsi que pour leur sant\u00e9.<\/p>\n<p class=\"justificar\" style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ainsi, la d\u00e9cision de vacciner l&rsquo;enfant est accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la m\u00e8re, \u00e9tant donn\u00e9 qu&rsquo;elle est la principale personne en charge de l&rsquo;enfant, qu&rsquo;elle a la garde et qu&rsquo;elle travaille dans le domaine de la sant\u00e9, o\u00f9 le risque de contracter le COVID-19 est plus \u00e9lev\u00e9 que dans d&rsquo;autres secteurs professionnels.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le tribunal d&rsquo;instruction n\u00b0 7 d&rsquo;Avil\u00e9s a accord\u00e9 \u00e0 la m\u00e8re la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cider de la vaccination d&rsquo;une enfant de 8 ans afin qu&rsquo;elle re\u00e7oive l&rsquo;ensemble des vaccins, conform\u00e9ment aux recommandations des autorit\u00e9s sanitaires. Cette d\u00e9cision du juge repose sur le fait que la m\u00e8re a la garde de l&rsquo;enfant, tandis que le p\u00e8re &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/un-tribunal-de-aviles-concede-a-la-madre-de-una-menor-de-ocho-anos-la-capacidad-decisoria-sobre-su-vacunacion\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continuer la lecture<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> de &laquo;&nbsp;Un tribunal d&rsquo;Avil\u00e9s accorde \u00e0 la m\u00e8re d&rsquo;un enfant de moins de huit ans le pouvoir de d\u00e9cision concernant sa vaccination.&nbsp;&raquo;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":587,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[54],"tags":[],"rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984.jpg",4290,6435,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984.jpg",4290,6435,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984.jpg",4290,6435,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984-200x300.jpg",200,300,true],"large":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984-683x1024.jpg",525,787,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984.jpg",1024,1536,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984.jpg",1365,2048,false],"twentyseventeen-featured-image":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984-2000x1200.jpg",2000,1200,true],"twentyseventeen-thumbnail-avatar":["https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/pexels-rodnae-productions-8488984-100x100.jpg",100,100,true]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"Joel","author_link":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/author\/joel\/"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"<a href=\"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/category\/non-classifiee\/\" rel=\"category tag\">Non classifi\u00e9(e)<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Le tribunal d&rsquo;instruction n\u00b0 7 d&rsquo;Avil\u00e9s a accord\u00e9 \u00e0 la m\u00e8re la capacit\u00e9 de d\u00e9cider de la vaccination d&rsquo;une enfant de 8 ans afin qu&rsquo;elle re\u00e7oive l&rsquo;ensemble des vaccins, conform\u00e9ment aux recommandations des autorit\u00e9s sanitaires. Cette d\u00e9cision du juge repose sur le fait que la m\u00e8re a la garde de l&rsquo;enfant, tandis que le p\u00e8re\u2026","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4202"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4202"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4202\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5719,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4202\/revisions\/5719"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/587"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/somniumlegal.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}